USPTO serial 78530475
TAO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMANDA WITT
AMANDA WITT LORD, BISSELL & BROOK LLP1900 THE PROSCENIUM, 1170 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Consumer electronics and accessories therefor, namely, digital audio broadcast radio receivers, satellite digital radio receivers, MP3 players, personal media players and 2-way radios, and carrying cases, headphones, wired and wireless speakers, and charging stations for use therewith; digital set-top boxes comprised of computer hardware and software for use in connection with delivery of personalized, interactive media content; PC/Voice Over IP telephone adapters; cordless telephones; wireless headsets for use with portable audio devices that can be used for listening to music and with telephone devices such as telephones and computers for answering telephone calls; digital picture frames for displaying digital photographs; LCD display screens; digital cameras; audio and video systems for vehicles consisting primarily of audio players, video players, speakers, display screens, and equalizers; telephone speakerphones; electronic sensors and receivers that alert users when a corresponding sensor tag is out of range or in range, or that give the location of automobiles, luggage, persons, wallets or purses, and other personal property; wireless network speakers; wireless network music devices, namely, wireless MP3 players and digital audio players that connect directly to the internet via wireless networking and can play music or be connected to a listening device | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | AAUW | ALLEGED AMENDMENT TO USE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |