USPTO serial 78530850
VIELLE SCENTUELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIELLE SCENTUELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane J. Mason
DIANE J MASON DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP555 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-1513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations; non-medicated skin creams; non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; skin conditioners; lip balms; skin emollients; face creams, skin gels; skin soaps; antiperspirants; hair shampoos; deodorants for personal use; pre-moistened non-medicated cosmetic wipes; disposable wipes impregnated with compounds for personal use; and essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medical preparations and substances for human use for the treatment of female sexual dysfunction and female orgasm latency; diagnostic and analytical preparations for medical use; menopause prediction test kit for home use; patches impregnated with medical substances and being for application to the skin for the treatment of female sexual dysfunction and female orgasm latency; medical preparations for topical use for the treatment of female sexual dysfunction and female orgasm latency; personal lubricants, namely, jellies, gels and oils; medical lubricant, namely, vaginal lubricants; medicated moisturizing lotions and creams for skin and body; medicated pre-moistened wipes; suppositories impregnated with lubricants for medical use; orgasm creams | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Apparatus for medical purposes for use in relation to the female human sexual response and for the control and treatment of female incontinence; therapeutic medical exercise apparatus for the strengthening, toning or the movement of muscles; medical apparatus for introducing pharmaceutical preparations into the human body; devices for the delivery or administration of medicines or of pharmaceuticals for contraception; devices for the delivery or the administration of medicines or of pharmaceuticals for fertility indication and for the promotion of conception; devices, apparatus and instruments for the application of medical or pharmaceutical compositions to or through the skin for the treatment of female sexual dysfunction, female sexual disorder, female orgasm latency, and female hyperactive sexual desire disorder; adult sexual aids, namely, sex prosthesis, electronic clitoral stimulators; body massage devices; electronic and non-electronic vibrators; non-electronic finger-held clitoral stimulators and parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |