Drawing for TOREX

USPTO serial 78532689

TOREX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOREX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PERLA M. KUHN

PERLA M. KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Unprocessed synthetic resins and plastics in the form of pellets, powders, pastes and liquids for industrial use; unexposed photosensitive relief printing plates; catalysts for use in the manufacture of industrial chemicals; adhesives for general industrial useACTIVE—
007Printing presses; printing plates; machines for making printing platesACTIVE—
009Optical fibers sold as a component of fiber optical cablesACTIVE—
010Catheters and balloon cathetersACTIVE—
011Water filtering units for domestic, commercial and industrial use, and water purifying apparatus for home and industrial useACTIVE—
017Plastics in the form of films and sheets; adhesive tape for industrial use; carbon fiber prepregs, namely, resin bonded carbon fibers in the form of sheet for industrial use; carbon fibers for a variety of industrial uses and not for textile use; plastic fibers for industrial use; insulating paintsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance