Drawing for MATRIX SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78533089

MATRIX SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MATRIX SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Cerce

JENNIFER L. CERCE MAIELLO, BRUNGO & MAIELLO, LLPONE CHURCHILL PARK3301 MCCRADY ROADPITTSBURGH, PA 15235

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services relating to business management and business operations, namely installation and maintenance of sales strategy and customer relationship software for the sales media industry used to develop, execute and monitor successful sales strategiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 12, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 1, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 12, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 14, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance