USPTO serial 78533102
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Cerce
JENNIFER L. CERCE MAIELLO, BRUNGO & MAIELLO, LLPONE CHURCHILL PARK3301 MCCRADY ROADPITTSBURGH, PA 15235| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use by the media industry encompassing television, cable, print, online and radio media sources for the development, execution and monitoring of successful sales strategies which permit the user to download historical and prospective sales data directly from traffic systems thereby providing up-to-date sales information | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |