Drawing for MATRIX PLUS

USPTO serial 78533102

MATRIX PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATRIX PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Cerce

JENNIFER L. CERCE MAIELLO, BRUNGO & MAIELLO, LLPONE CHURCHILL PARK3301 MCCRADY ROADPITTSBURGH, PA 15235

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use by the media industry encompassing television, cable, print, online and radio media sources for the development, execution and monitoring of successful sales strategies which permit the user to download historical and prospective sales data directly from traffic systems thereby providing up-to-date sales informationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 11, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 11, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 1, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 1, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 30, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Dec 21, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Dec 21, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Oct 12, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 14, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 18, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Apr 18, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance