USPTO serial 78533291
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HIGHLAND PARK, IL
FORT WASHINGTON, PA
HIGHLAND PARK, IL
HIGHLAND PARK, IL
HIGHLAND PARK, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Browne
ROBERT E BROWNE NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO N LASALLE ST STE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing continuing medical education courses, namely, providing in a short format, on demand, continuing education programs to medical professionals anywhere and any time over the telephone | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 13, 2003 |
| 044 | Providing news and information relating to healthcare, namely, providing in a short format, on demand, information to medical professionals, patients and consumers related to healthcare, anywhere and any time over the telephone | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 13, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |