USPTO serial 78533383
WINFUEL IS THE FIRST EVER MULTI-VITAMIN THAT'S ALL ABOUT WINNING. THAT'S WHY WE CALL IT THE FIRST-EVER MULTI-VITAWIN.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINFUEL IS THE FIRST EVER MULTI-VITAMIN THAT'S ALL ABOUT WINNING. THAT'S WHY WE CALL IT THE FIRST-EVER MULTI-VITAWIN.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CEDAR KNOLLS, NJ
CEDAR KNOLLS, NJ
Cedar Knolls, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin C. Dailey
WINFUEL INC ATTENTION KEVIN C DAILEY17 FARINELLA DRIVEEAST HANOVER, NJ 07936UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Multi-vitamins; Dietary / Nutritional Supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WINFUEL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WINFUEL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Goen Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named WINFUEL IS THE FIRST EVER MULTI-VITAMIN THAT'S ALL ABOUT WINNING. THAT'S WHY WE CALL IT THE FIRST-EVER MULTI-VITAWIN.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |