USPTO serial 78533508
CSM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CSM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine Page
KATHERINE PAGE CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLPCRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 825 8TH ANEW YORK, NY 10019-7475UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |