USPTO serial 78533599
TATE & LYLE REBALANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TATE & LYLE REBALANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sanjiv Sarwate
Robert W. Sacoff PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned and bottled fruit in syrup; milk-based drinks containing syrups;marmalades, jams and jellies containing syrups; meat, not live fish, poultry and game; meat extract; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies;jams; fruit puree; eggs; milk; milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; marmalade, jams, jellies; preserved fruits;frozen edible proteins for human consumption; protein concentrates for foodstuffs for human consumption; protein for human consumption; protein preparations for use as additives to foodstuffs for human consumption; protein preparations in the form of liquids for use as foodstuffs for human consumption; whey protein concentrates used as a food additive; concentrates for use in creaming beverages;dairy and non-dairy creamer; preserved fruits, vegetables, and meats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Golden flavoring syrup; golden thickening syrup; glucose flavoring syrup; glucose thickening syrup; inverted flavoring syrup; inverted thickening syrup; partially inverted flavoring syrup; partially inverted thickening syrup; maple syrup; maple flavored syrups; bakery products containing syrup included in this class; confectionery products containing syrup, namely candies, chocolates, bonbons, and pastries; cakes containing golden syrup; biscuits containing golden syrup; treacle tarts; flapjacks; confectionery containing golden syrup, namely candies, chocolates, bonbons and pastries; food products containing golden syrup, namely bakery products, candies, chocolates, bonbons and pastries included in this class; fructose flavoring and thickening syrup for use in the manufacture of foods; molasses syrup for food; sugar; sugar for use in the manufacture and processing of food; inverted sugar; partially inverted sugar; liquid sugar; flour, food starch, and gluten used in the preparation of foods; cocoa; rice; tapioca; sago; flour and bakery products; bread; pastry; flavored ices; honey; treacle; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; spices; confectionery ices; cocoa; chocolate; biscuits and cakes not containing liquorice, ready-made sauces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Golden syrup for making fruit juices and soft drinks; fruit juices and soft drinks containing or consisting of sweetening materials, preparations, and substances; fruit juices and soft drinks made from syrup; syrup for making beverages; syrup powder for beverages; non-alcoholic brewed malt beverages; malt based syrups and powders for making beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific research in the field of food technology and animal feed technology; research relating to food stuffs and food products; technology consultation in the field of food production; computerized food analysis services;computer research services in the field of foodstuffs, food products, food technology, and food manufacturing; contract research services in the field of food technology and animal feed technology; new product research; quality control relating to the hygiene of food and foodstuffs for others;advisory services relating to national and international regulations concerning food; consultation services for the aforesaid services, which include providing reports and information via an on-line database and via the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tate & Lyle Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Tate & Lyle Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Tate & Lyle Plc
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TATE & LYLE REBALANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |