Drawing for INTEL INSIDE VIIV

USPTO serial 78534023

INTEL INSIDE VIIV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEL INSIDE VIIV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile

Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DATA PROCESSING HARDWARE, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, SEMICONDUCTORS, MICROPROCESSORS AND OTHER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING SEMICONDUCTORS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, COMPUTER CHIPSETS FOR USE IN TRANSMITTING DATA TO AND FROM A CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT, COMPUTER MOTHERBOARDS AND DAUGHTERBOARDS, MICROCOMPUTERS, SOFTWARE PROGRAMMABLE MICROPROCESSORS, COMPUTER FIRMWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER UTILITY SOFTWARE AND OTHER COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO MAINTAIN AND OPERATE COMPUTER SYSTEMS ALL STORED IN A COMPUTER'S READ-ONLY MEMORY (ROM) OR ELSEWHERE IN THE COMPUTER'S CIRCUITRY AND OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKING SOFTWARE FOR WIRED AND WIRELESS NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS AND CONNECTIVITY, WIRELESS AND WIRED MODEMS, COMPUTER NETWORK ADAPTERS AND NETWORK CARD ADAPTERS; DATA PROCESSING HARDWARE, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, SEMICONDUCTORS, MICROPROCESSORS AND OTHER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING SEMICONDUCTORS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, COMPUTER CHIPSETS, COMPUTER MOTHERBOARDS AND DAUGHTERBOARDS, MICROCOMPUTERS, SOFTWARE PROGRAMMABLE PROCESSORS, COMPUTER FIRMWARE AND OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING SOFTWARE, WIRELESS AND WIRE MODEMS, NETWORK ADAPTERS AND NETWORK ADAPTER CARDS; DATA PROCESSING HARDWARE, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, SEMICONDUCTORS, MICROPROCESSORS AND OTHER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING SEMICONDUCTORS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, COMPUTER CHIPSETS, COMPUTER MOTHERBOARDS AND DAUGHTERBOARDS, MICROCOMPUTERS, SOFTWARE PROGRAMMABLE PROCESSORS, COMPUTER FIRMWARE AND OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING SOFTWARE, WIRELESS AND WIRE MODEMS, NETWORK ADAPTERS AND NETWORK ADAPTER CARDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 9, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 8, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance