Drawing for R55 BY RAMPAGE

USPTO serial 78534273

R55 BY RAMPAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R55 BY RAMPAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cell phone casesACTIVE—
018Umbrellas, wallets, purses, handbags, messenger bags, backpacks, duffel bags, gym bags, luggage, brief cases, fanny packs, cosmetics and toiletry bags sold emptyACTIVE—
025Men's, women's and children's clothing and accessories, namely, hosiery, underwear, lingerie, layettes, jeans, belts, eveningwear, namely, evening gowns, evening skirts, evening tops, evening jackets, evening wraps and evening shawls; swimwear, hats, caps, gloves and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 15, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance