Drawing for HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING

USPTO serial 78534275

HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian M. Daucher; Carlo F. Van den Bosch; Yael Karabelnik; Michelle M. LaVoie; Timothy L. Epp

BRIAN M DAUCHER CARLO F VAN DEN BOSCH SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP4TH FL650 TOWN CTR DRCOSTA MESA, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial Services, namely origination, processing, servicing, consolidation and scrutinizing of home, auto, educational, consumer and personal loansACTIVEFeb 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 26, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 25, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 23, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance