Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78534402?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78534402. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CALCI-TRIPLEX?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78534402, the listed owner(s) include: LEANBALANCE US TRADEMARK LTD., LEANBALANCE US TRADEMARK LTD., SLIM-CAL US Trademark Ltd..

What is USPTO serial number 78534402?

Serial number 78534402 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CALCI-TRIPLEX. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover CALCI-TRIPLEX?

The public record lists International Classes: 005. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78534402

CALCI-TRIPLEX

Q: What is the current status of CALCI-TRIPLEX?

CALCI-TRIPLEX (78534402) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Dec 17, 2004
Status date: May 1, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: DWYER, JOHN D
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALCI-TRIPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

LEANBALANCE US TRADEMARK LTD.
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEANBALANCE US TRADEMARK LTD.
LEANBALANCE US TRADEMARK LTD.
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEANBALANCE US TRADEMARK LTD.
SLIM-CAL US Trademark Ltd.
Mississauga, CA
Other trademarks owned by SLIM-CAL US Trademark Ltd.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard J. Shire

HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
005	Ingredient blend, namely, calcium sold as a component of nutritional supplements	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 2, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 2, 2008	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2008	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2007	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2007	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jul 2, 2007	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jul 2, 2007	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jun 29, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 27, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 27, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 27, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 18, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Apr 19, 2007	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Mar 28, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 18, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2006	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Aug 10, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Aug 1, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 31, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 31, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jul 31, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 31, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 30, 2006	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 23, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 23, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Dec 29, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—