USPTO serial 78534732
FARMER SNOWBOARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARMER SNOWBOARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jefferson City, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Brad York
HAL GIBBS GIBBS POOL TURNER PC3225 A EMERALD LN PO BOX 6670JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear, namely; wetsuits, swimwear, singlets, t-shirts, shirts and casual tops with long and short sleeves, bodysuits, sweat tops, hooded parkas, jackets, coats, jumpers, shorts, board shorts, walking shorts, volley shorts, long pants, beach pants, trousers, slacks, jeans, overalls, dresses, skirts, sarongs, leisure wear, sporting and gymnastic wear, ski wear, aprons, pajamas, nightwear, dressing gowns, bathrobes, underwear, lingerie, stockings, pantyhose, socks, vests, belts, braces, mittens, gloves, scarves, ear muffs, bandannas, beanies, headbands, hats, visors, caps, hoods and head coverings with and without canopy of sunshield, slippers, boots, shoes, beach shoes, thonged and strapped sandals, special sporting and gymnastic footwear, athletic shoes, boots for sports, snow boots, snowboards boots, ski boots, kiteboard boots, surfboard boots | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1993 |
| 028 | Sporting apparatus namely surfboards, bodyboards, kneeboards, wakeboards, sailboards, surf skis, snowboards, snow skis, water-skis, skateboards, kiteboards; sporting accessories namely leg ropes and security leashes for sport apparatus, sporting apparatus ropes especially adapted and fitted as tow-in ropes and skiing ropes, ski bindings, surfboard deck grips, swim fins including swim fins for bodyboarding, wax for skis and surfboards; covers and protective bags for sporting apparatus namely bags for surfboards, bodyboards, kneeboards, wakeboards, sailboards, surf skies, snowboards, snow skis, water-skis, skateboards and kiteboards | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |