USPTO serial 78534880
BERRY DEFENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3496999Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2008
- Examiner
- GENOVESE, CARRIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BERRY DEFENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie J. Gallo
Leslie J. Gallo 3711 Vanguard Drive, Suite AFORT WAYNE IN 46809-3047Fort Wayne, IN 46809UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Berry blend sold as an integral component of dietary supplements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 16, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Artemis International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Artemis International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Artemis International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named BERRY DEFENSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |