USPTO serial 78534993
LION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
4-2-3 Cordoba, ES
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer operating system software only; That excludes computer applications and includes the system software only. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |