Drawing for KENEXA HR THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

USPTO serial 78535458

KENEXA HR THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KENEXA HR THOUGHT LEADERSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Kennedy

Paul J. Kennedy PEPPER HAMILTON LLP18TH AND ARCH STREETS3000 TWO LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and consultation services in the field of human resources management, namely, providing assessment services to determine management, leadership, administration, sales, and executive behaviors, skills and competencies; and providing human resource management services via a global computer networkACTIVE—
041Training in the field of human resources management, namely, providing training in management, leadership, administrative, sales and executive behaviors, skills and competenciesACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software via a global computer network for use by human resources personnel for assessing, training and management of employees and employment candidates; and application service provider (ASP) services featuring software in the field of human resources for use by human resources personnel for assessing, training and management of employees and employment candidatesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 2, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 2, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance