USPTO serial 78535684
DURALIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3252904Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2007
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DURALIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GRAND JUNCTION, CO
GRAND JUNCTION, CO
GRAND JUNCTION, CO
Grand Junction, CO
CLARK MATERIAL HANDLING COMPANY
LEXINGTON, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Berge
Amy B. Berge Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP101 South Fifth Street3500 National City TowerLouisville, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Golf cart seat cushions mounted on bases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FAIRPLAY ELECTRIC CARS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FAIRPLAY ELECTRIC CARS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FAIRPLAY ELECTRIC CARS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Player Golf Car, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CLARK MATERIAL HANDLING COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named DURALIFE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |