USPTO serial 78535821
PIT BULL US SPORTS THE MIGHTY MIGHTY PIT BULLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIT BULL US SPORTS THE MIGHTY MIGHTY PIT BULLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARL GORDON OF GORDON DESIGNS
CARL GORDON OF GORDON DESIGNS GORDON DESIGNS1125 S HOLT AVE STE 3LOS ANGELES, CA 90035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING SPORTING EVENTS; PROVIDING SPORTS INFORMATION BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE AND WEB SITES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR SPORTS TOURNAMENTS; PROVIDING VARIOUS FACILITIES FOR AN ARRAY OF SPORTING EVENTS, SPORTS AND ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS; ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING PROFESSIONAL AND AMATEUR GOLF AND BILLIARD TOURNAMENTS; AND THE PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION AND INTERNET PROGRAMS FEATURING ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |