Drawing for FALLEN OAK

USPTO serial 78536341

FALLEN OAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FALLEN OAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. McCue

Michael J. McCue Lewis and Roca LLP3993 Howard Hughes ParkwaySte. 600Las Vegas, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Beverageware, mugs, drinking steins, cups, plates, trays, cookie jars, water bottles sold empty, insulated beverage holders, vases, statues and statuettes of crystal, glass, china, porcelain, earthenware and terra cotta, non-metal candlestick holders, coasters not made of paper and not being table linen, bottle openers, cork screws, recipe boxes, sandwich boxes, lunch boxes and soap boxes, hair brushes, hair combs and non-metal banks, toothbrushes, electric toothbrushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 25, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 18, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance