USPTO serial 78537034
DENTI-GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2007
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENTI-GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KRISH MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC.
VALENCIA, CA
Khetarpal Living Trust, comprising Harish Khetarpal and Kiran Roma Khetarpal, both U.S. citizens
Santa Clarita, CA
Khetarpal Living Trust, comprising Harish Khetarpal and Kiran Roma Khetarpal, both U.S. citizens
Santa Clarita, CA
Khetarpal Living Trust, comprising Harish Khetarpal and Kiran Roma Khetarpal, both U.S. citizens
Santa Clarita, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph C. Andras
Joseph Andras Myers Dawes Andras & Sherman LLP19900 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 1150Irvine, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical and dental gloves for medical use by medical professionals | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KRISH MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Khetarpal Living Trust, comprising Harish Khetarpal and Kiran Roma Khetarpal, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks owned by Khetarpal Living Trust, comprising Harish Khetarpal and Kiran Roma Khetarpal, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks owned by Khetarpal Living Trust, comprising Harish Khetarpal and Kiran Roma Khetarpal, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DENTI-GRIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 29, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |