USPTO serial 78537075
SHALINI TASTE THAT STAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHALINI TASTE THAT STAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Kusner
MARK KUSNER KUSNER & JAFFE6151 WILSON MILLS RD STE 310HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-2128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | pickles, namely pickled vegetables and pickled fruits; snack foods, namely prepared ready-to-eat foods consisting primarily of chick-peas, lentils, beans, peanuts, potato, spices and/or mixed nuts; spicy-flavored peanuts and cashews; dried tomato wafers; banana and plantain chips and cassava chips; food package combinations consisting primarily of cooked vegetables, yogurt, fried cassava and preserved fruits; canned vegetables; fruit preserves and non-alcoholic fruit pulps | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | confectionery, namely confectionery consisting primarily of chick-peas, milk solids, yogurt, coconut, flour, bean flour and/or almonds; baked goods, namely vegetable-filled pastries, chick-pea-based puff pastries, biscuits, bread and rolls; flour, namely rice flour, wheat flour, and chick-pea flour; condiments, namely spices; paste of prepared spices; chutney; food package combinations consisting primarily of noodles and rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Surati Sweet Mart Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Surati Sweet Mart Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SHALINI TASTE THAT STAYS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |