Drawing for SAVANNAH

USPTO serial 78537727

SAVANNAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURNS, ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAVANNAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dyann L. Kostello

DYANN L KOSTELLO MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPSTE 3300100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Toilet soaps.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 2, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 2, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 2, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 23, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance