USPTO serial 78537765
NUTRIFULL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRIFULL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
Carole F. Barrett HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKINTHREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SEVENTH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements and nutritional supplements for weight management; meal replacement drinks; meal replacement shakes; meal replacement powders; nutritional drink for use as a meal replacement; nutritional shake for use as a meal replacement; nutritional powder for use as a meal replacement | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Soy-based food, namely, fruit and soy based snack food, soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; soy-based snack foods; frozen and prepared meals consisting primarily of soy-based food beverage; frozen and prepared meals consisting of a beverage consisting primarily of soymilk, fruit juices and tea; soy-based powder for nutritional purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Soy-based ice cream substitute; soy-based pudding; soy-based custards; soy-based noodles and pasta | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes; soy-based beverages containing fruit juices; soy-based beverages containing tea or tea flavor; soy-based beverages containing vegetable juices; fruit juices and fruit drinks made with soy; fruit and vegetable based non-carbonated non-alcoholic drinks and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vitasoy USA Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vitasoy USA Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NUTRIFULL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |