USPTO serial 78538065
MIA VERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIA VERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics namely lipstick, lip shine, makeup remover, eye shadow, mascara, lip pencil, eye pencil; eye make-up remover; bath gel; deoderant; hand soap; lotions, cleansing lotion, body lotion, all purpose lotion; creams, face cream, anti-aging cream, night cream, all purpose cream, acne cream, foot cream, bleaching cream, lip cream, anti-cellulite cream, stretch mark cream; toner, firming & toning mist; facial masks, masque activator; facial scrub; aftershave, pre-shaving treatment, shaving cream, shaving gel; astringent, acne pads; cuticle remover; corn remover; hemorrhoid pad & gel; breast enhancement gel; bath oils, salts & tonics, bubble bath; hair care products namely shampoo, conditioner, hair relaxer, detangeler, hair spray, wave neutralizer, hair repair treatment, scalp treatment cream, brillantine; suntan lotion and oil, sunblock, mosturizing lotion, sunburn relief and pet shampoo & conditioner | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |