USPTO serial 78538149
DINNER DIVAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3626981Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2009
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DINNER DIVAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sara S. Hare and Uwe Settegast
Walnut Creek, CA
Sara S. Hare and Uwe Settegast
Walnut Creek, CA
Sara S. Hare and Uwe Settegast
Walnut Creek, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Planning and conducting culinary special events in the nature of cooking parties; and cooking schools. | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 17, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sara S. Hare and Uwe Settegast
- Other trademarks owned by Sara S. Hare and Uwe Settegast
- Other trademarks owned by Sara S. Hare and Uwe Settegast
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DINNER DIVAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |