USPTO serial 78538181
SIPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOLMAR, WINSTON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for electronic payment services, authentication, identification and transaction services for merchants by means of on-line databases; computer software for electronic processing and transmission of payments to merchants; computer software for electronic processing and transmission of payment to merchants via on-line debit, checking, credit card, and loyalty/reward account payments; computer software providing a biometric authentication and payment system; computers; computer operating programs, computer programs and computer software for interpreting, generating and printing of codes; processing of credit card transactions and other financial transactions; computer network and terminal equipment; point-of-sale computer terminals; circuit boards; digital pens; digital forms; electronic data entry pads; controllers and plastic cards for controlling access to computer systems and networks, and for establishing identity based on various biometric properties; telecommunications services, namely, cellular telephone communication, communications by computer terminals, communications by telephone, computer aided transmission of messages and images, electronic mail, facsimile transmission, communication by short-range radio link; information about telecommunication; professional non-business consultation services, computer programming, maintenance of computer software updating of computer software, computer software design, licensing of intellectual property; user manuals; books, brochures, data sheets, white papers, catalogs, and magazines in the fields of computer and information technology, financial and insurance services; providing services of data processing, transaction processing, business intelligence, analytics, reporting, data mining, and market research; providing consultation services and advice in the fields of computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals, computer systems, computer networks, computer security, and data and transaction processing; leasing services in the fields of computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals, computer systems and computer networks; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software and hardware; verifying the authenticity and scope of authorization of signatures; verifying identities using biometric techniques; processing electronic transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |