USPTO serial 78538618
BABY BITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY BITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLEN A. MEYER [MARYLAND STATE BAR]
CAROL DESMOND TRADEMARKS TO GO, INC.445 HAMILTON AVENUESUITE #1102WHITE PLAINS, NY 10601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER AND PAPER GOODS, NAMELY, ARTICLES FOR PUBLICATION IN BOOKS AND PERIODICALS FEATURING CHILDREN'S STORIES, ACTION ADVENTURE, COMEDY AND DRAMA; BOOKMARKS AND BOOKCOVERS; COLORING BOOKS, CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY BOOKS; COMIC BOOKS; STATIONERY, NAMELY, DIARIES, ENVELOPES, GREETING CARDS, NOTEBOOKS, NOTE CARDS, AND WRITING PAPER; COLORED PENCILS, CRAYONS, MARKERS, PAINTING SETS, PENS AND PENCILS; CALENDARS; DECALS AND STICKERS; MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS; GIFT WRAPPING PAPER; POSTERS; PAPER PARTY FAVORS AND PAPER PARTY DECORATIONS; SERIES OF CHILDREN'S BOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, ACTIVITY PLAYSETS FOR BUILDING AND DOLLS COMPRISED OF MULTIPLE ACTION FIGURES AND ENVIRONMENTS, AND CONSISTING OF MAZES, SHAPE PUZZLES AND MATCHING SET GAMES; BALLOONS, CARD GAMES, DOLLS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL PUSH, PLUSH, RUBBER CHARACTER AND MUSICAL TOYS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF NOISEMAKERS, PLAY FIGURES, PLUSH TOYS, PUPPETS, JIGSAW AND MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, RUBBER BALLS AND SOFT SCULPTURE; PLAYING CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |