USPTO serial 78538655
TEODOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3207380Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TEODOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Kiel, DE
Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Kiel, DE
Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Ostfildern, DE
Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Geissler
Martin R. Geissler MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, PLLC4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots, including robots for explosive ordinance detection and disposal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Detectors for the detection and removal of explosives, mines and ammunition; robotic controllers and programmable calculators for explosive ordinance detection and disposal; metal detectors; non-medical x-ray devices for explosive ordinance detection | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Remote-controlled vehicles for explosive ordinance detection and disposal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Development and technical project planning of security-technological devices and systems for others, technical consulting for the application of security-technological devices and systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TEODOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |