USPTO serial 78538978
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WHISKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3588978Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 10, 2009
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROCKY MOUNTAIN WHISKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARK CITY, UT
Park City, UT
Park City, UT
Wanship, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Shaw LLP Seyfarth Shaw LLP233 South Wacker DriveSuite 8000Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Distilled spirits, namely, whiskey | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 9, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HIGH WEST DISTILLERY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Quaking Aspen Distillers, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Quaking Aspen Distillers, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HIGH WEST DISTILLERY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ROCKY MOUNTAIN WHISKEY
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |