USPTO serial 78538998
VIANNEY NUEVA GENERACION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VIANNEY NUEVA GENERACION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Owner
Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
20040-Aguascaliantes, MX
Other trademarks owned by Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
20040-Aguascaliantes, MX
Other trademarks owned by Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Aguascalientes, MX
Other trademarks owned by Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Pérez-Guerrero
Arturo Pérez-Guerrero Law Offices of Arturo Pérez-GuerreroP.O. Box 9024163San Juan, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | TABLE CLOTHS AND NAPKINS NOT MADE OF PAPER; UNFITTED FABRIC SOFA COVER; BED CLOTHS, NAMELY, COMFORTERS, BED SPREADS, DUVETS, BED SHEETS, DUST RUFFLES, PILLOW SHAMS, PILLOW SLIPS, COUNTERPANES, NAMELY BEDSPREADS THAT EXTEND TO COVER THE LEGS OF THE BED; BLANKET THROWS, BED BLANKETS; CURTAIN SETS CONSISTING OF CURTAINS AND CURTAIN RODS; TOILET SETS CONSISTING OF FITTED TOILET LID COVERS MADE OF FABRIC; KITCHEN ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, POT HOLDERS, OVEN MITTS, AND TOWELS; TORTILLA COVERS, NAMELY, CLOTHS TO COVER TORTILLAS | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING BEDDING, TABLE CLOTHS; MAIL AND ONLINE CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING BEDDING, TABLE CLOTHS | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Union Textil Vianney, S. de R.L. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VIANNEY NUEVA GENERACION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |