Drawing for STA-PLEX

USPTO serial 78539065

STA-PLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, SEAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STA-PLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG PC1628 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD 15TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004automotive and general purpose greasesABANDONEDMar 1, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 21, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 21, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance