Drawing for Serial No. 78539244

USPTO serial 78539244

Serial No. 78539244

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78539244?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond G. Areaux (#33,643)

Raymond G. Areaux (#33,643) CARVER, DARDEN, KORETZKY, TESSIER, FINN1100 POYDRAS STSUITE 2700NEW ORLEANS, LA 70163-2700

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, books, booklets, magazines, newsletters, and pamphlets in the field of public transportation; paper goods, namely, address books, appointment books, art prints, binders, book marks, bumper stickers, calendars, date books, decals, decorative pencil-top ornaments, desk top planners, diaries and blank writing journals, maps, notebooks, note cards, note pads, occasion cards, paper for wrapping and packaging, paper shopping bags, post cards, posters, stationery, and writing pads and paperACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 10, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance