Drawing for CANAL STREET CAR

USPTO serial 78539424

CANAL STREET CAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CANAL STREET CAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond G. Areaux (#33,643)

Marsha J. Hopper Executive Counsel, Regional Transit Authority2817 Canal StreetNew Orleans, LA 70119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, bandanas, baseball caps, belts, blouses, caps, golf shirts, hats, hat bands, headwear, infantwear, jackets, jerseys, jogging suits, long-sleeve denim shirts, pajamas, pants, polo shirts, ponchos, pullovers, rainwear, scarves, shirts, shorts, sleepwear, socks, sun visors, sweat bands, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweat suits, ties, and t-shirtsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 29, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 29, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 8, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance