USPTO serial 78539517
CHONDROGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHONDROGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Costanza
KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations, namely, surgical and injectable gels for the treatment of skeletal, including bone and cartilage, injuries and conditions | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | medical devices, namely, surgical implants comprising artificial material and injectable gel implants comprising artificial material | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |