Drawing for TOTAL VALUE PROPOSITION, THERE ARE NO EQUALS

USPTO serial 78539792

TOTAL VALUE PROPOSITION, THERE ARE NO EQUALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TOTAL VALUE PROPOSITION, THERE ARE NO EQUALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna L. Caswell

DONNA L CASWELL BENSON EDWARDS LLP200 270 HWY 33 WKELOWNA, BC V1X 1X7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Sawmill and planermill consulting services pertaining to the design, fabrication, installation, operation and optimization of sawmills and planermills including the following specific areas: control systems for lumber processing; non-contact vision scanners; grade scanners; optimization and processing computer software for trimming, edging and curve sawing, and for management of lumber sorting and production; computer hardware and user interface devices; lumber processing, handling, and packaging equipment, namely, log buckers and sorters, log rotators, and primary breakdown machine centers including profile and curve sawing machine centers, gang saws, edger positioning tables, board edgers, multi-saw trimmers, lug loaders, transfers, roll cases, endpresses, slowdown belts, board graders, trimmer positioning fences, bin sorters, lath placers, stick hopper fillers and placers, lumber stackers, lumber unscramblers and tilt hoistsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 7, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance