USPTO serial 78539801
PROSIT PRINT SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROSIT PRINT SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Broomall, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph M. Konieczny, Sr.
JOSEPH M KONIECZNY SR JOSEPH M KONIECZNY PCPO BOX 387CONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428-0387UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | commercial copying services, namely duplicating of, photocopying of, and compiling of documents for others; compiling and mailing of documents and items to recipients on a mailing list | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |