USPTO serial 78539883
E-ONTHEGO.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-ONTHEGO.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA
Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. James
MARK B JAMES WHITE & LEE LLP805 SW BROADWAY STE 2440PORTLAND, OR 97205-3317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Analyzing the cost, quality and performance of telecommunications service rate plans for others; business consulting services regarding the field of telecommunications, namely consulting services related to request for proposal (RFP) design and documentation, telecommunications rate plan negotiations, and the optimization of telecommunications service and rate plans; auditing and data management services for others related to telecommunication service plans and equipment and other telecommunicatiosn related expenses; order fulfillment services in the field of telecommunications equipment sales. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Consulting services in the field of telecommunications, namely consulting services related to the optimization of telecommunications services. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |