USPTO serial 78539890
WE DON'T CLAIM TO MAKE THE MOST...ONLY THE BEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2006
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WE DON'T CLAIM TO MAKE THE MOST...ONLY THE BEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Forestville, CA
North Forestville, CA
North Forestville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie Shelden
Jamie Shelden Law Office of Jamie Shelden1760 Suite F, PMB 220 Airline HighwayHollister, CA 95023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Jams; jellies; marmalades; fruit conserves; cream cheese and flavored cream cheese spreads; cranberry sauce; dried fruit; food oils, namely, peanut, avocado and almond; fruit-based toppings; fruit butters; fruit-based spreads; ice cream toppings, namely, fruit, nut and whipped topping; jerky; frozen mixed vegetables; nut butters; roasted and processed nuts; olive oil for culinary purposes; processed olives; pickles; fruit preserves; snack dip excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; marinated tomatoes; fruit-based fillings for pies, fruit preserves | ACTIVE | Mar 19, 1985 |
| 030 | Mustard; Table Syrup; Vinegar; Barbecue Sauce; Bakery Products; Breads; Chocolates; Chutneys; Cocktail Sauce; Cookies; Entree Sauces; Frozen Doughs; Frozen Sherbert; Frozen Yogurt; Fruit Flavored Sauces; Fruit Preserves; Grilling Sauce; Honeys; Ice Cream Toppings, namely, chocolate and marshmallow; Ketchup; Marinades; Pancake Mix; Pasta Sauces; Pesto Sauce; Pie Crusts; Chocolate-based and custard-based fillings for pies; Pies; Relish; Salad Dressings; Salsas; Seasonings; Seasoned Pepper; Seasoned Salt; Spaghetti Sauce; Spices; Steak Sauces; Tarter Sauce; Teriyaki Sauces; Vinaigrettes; Food syrups of various flavors, namely, flavoring syrups | ACTIVE | Mar 19, 1985 |
| 033 | [ wine ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 19, 1985 |
| 035 | [ Retail stores featuring food, condiments, sauces, fruit, and vegetables as well as non-food kitchen sundries and tools ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 19, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kozlowski Farms
- Other trademarks owned by Kozlowski Farms
- Other trademarks owned by Kozlowski Farms
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named WE DON'T CLAIM TO MAKE THE MOST...ONLY THE BEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |