USPTO serial 78540928
INSTITUTE FOR GENDER JUSTICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTITUTE FOR GENDER JUSTICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Lovitz, Esq.
MICHAEL L LOVITZ ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, academic research and writing on deconstructing the relevant operation paradigms in all fields, development of gender-inclusive policies and standards; study of women's values, the culture of women and women's culture as it may be unique or different; identification and reconstruction of public and private policies reflecting evolving gender standards; review public policy and corporate policy for gender components affecting all legal, cultural, and societal issues affecting women, including but not limited to gender discrimination; research and identify and demonstrate by discussion and writings the scope and depth of gender identity and women's values as they affect all global policies; archiving and dispersing gender analyses to non-profit and for profit entities, for identifying the panoply of existing women's issues; engaging experts to advance the education, understanding and implementation of new paradigms on gender equality and women's values; providing information via forums, writings, symposia, on Economy, Employment, Social Security, Energy, Anti-Terrorism, Health, Insurance, Courts, the Justice system, Journalism, Sports, Politics, Religion, the Arts, Taxes, Legislation; Anthropology to Zoology - research on how these two disciplines can provide, by analogy, new gender inclusive science research; providing research and teachings to insure justice for women in every aspect of the world's offerings; fostering new knowledge and resources to address decision making and resource management to insure integration of gender parity into the standard under which entities and human resources operate; education on improving resources through recognition of gender parity in all phases of productivity from the individual to the corporate, governmental , profit and non-profit and all activity which is critical to expanding development and betterment of the world | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |