Drawing for ALASKA GROWN

USPTO serial 78541425

ALASKA GROWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALASKA GROWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Flynt, David S. Abrams, Alfred N. Goodman, Mark S. Bicks, John E. Holmes, Lance G. Johnson, Stacey J. Longanecker, Garrett V. Davis, Christian C. Michel, Stephen G. Janoski, Stanislav Torgovitsky, Megan E. Gray, Kevin M. Barner, Paul D. Pyla, M

RICHARD A. FLYNT1300 19TH STREET NWSUITE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-9076

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, hooded sweatshirts, adult short-sleeved T-shirts, adult long-sleeved T-shirts, youth T-shirts, infant T-shirts, aprons, baseball-style caps, women's tank tops, men's tank tops, work shirts and shortsABANDONEDAug 15, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 13, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
May 2, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 2, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance