Drawing for JEAN BAPTISTE

USPTO serial 78541496

JEAN BAPTISTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JEAN BAPTISTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law

Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law Binderow Law Offices1330 Camino Del MarSuite 250Del Mar, CA 92014

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Outer and under wear apparel, namely, t-shirts, hats, caps, pants, weather-resistant jackets and pants, athletic wear, namely, jerseys, sweat shirts, warm-up suits, track suits, sweat bands, all with distinctive logo designsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 13, 2006NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Sep 24, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance