Drawing for KATSUREI

USPTO serial 78541647

KATSUREI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KATSUREI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles W. Forlidas

CHARLES W FORLIDAS MILLER & MARTIN PLLCVOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVE STE 1000CHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029seafood, seafood products and foods prepared from seafood, namely, preserved and frozen crayfish, crustaceans, fish, lobsters, mussels, oysters, shellfish and shrimpABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 5, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jun 5, 2006PBICWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance