USPTO serial 78541661
FALANX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FALANX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
N-7014 TRONDHEIM, NO
Trondheim, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT C WOODBRIDGE
ROBERT C WOODBRIDGE SYNNESTVEDT LECHNER & WOODBRIDGE LLPPO BOX 592PRINCETON, NJ 08542-0592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; semiconductor chips; integrated circuits; microprocessors;microprocessor cores for graphics, multimedia and/or video systems; integrated circuits for graphics, multimedia and/or video systems; multimedia accelerators including physics accelerators and music accelerators; graphics accelerators; 2Dand/or 3D graphics accelerators; accelerators for video encoding and/or decoding;multimedia, graphics and/or video accelerators for use with portable devices,handheld devices, mobile communication devices, mobile telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), tablet PCs, game consoles and/or in-car infotainment and navigation systems; computer software for designing, configuring, operating and/or managing semiconductor chips, integrated circuits, microprocessors,microprocessor cores, multimedia accelerators, graphics accelerators and/or video accelerators; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, design, consultancy and advisory services for others relating to computer hardware and to computer software for designing, configuring,operating and/or managing semiconductor chips, integrated circuits,microprocessors, microprocessor cores, multimedia accelerators including physics accelerators and music accelerators, graphics accelerators and/or video accelerators; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems for graphics, multimedia and/or video systems;computer programming for others relating to the design, configuration, operation and/or management of semiconductor chips, integrated circuits, microprocessors,microprocessor cores, multimedia accelerators including physics accelerators and music accelerators, graphics accelerators and/or video accelerators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |