USPTO serial 78541839
RICH JOHN RICHMOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RICH JOHN RICHMOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
Thomas J. Moore BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LANE, FOURTH FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; shampoos; talcum powder; bubble bath; bath foam; bath salts; bath oil; shower gel; hair lotions; hair gel; hair wax; toothpaste; perfumes; eau de cologne; after-shave lotions; after-shave balms; shaving soap; shaving preparations; antiperspirants; deodorants for personal use; essential oils for personal use; non-medicated toiletries; non-medicated skin care preparations; cosmetics; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; make-up removing preparations; non-medicated mouthwash; nail care preparations; nail varnishes and polishes, for cosmetic purposes; nail varnish removing preparations for cosmetic purposes; depilatories; emery boards; pumice stone for personal use; beauty masks; perfuming sachets; scented wood; shoe creams and polishes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Sunglasses; spectacles; frames for spectacles and sunglasses; eyeglass lenses; ophthalmic lenses; contact lenses; spectacle and sunglass cases and pouches; chains, cords and straps for sunglasses and spectacles; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys and goods made of precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes, namely, ornamental pins, lapel pins, tie pins, badges, brooches, belt buckles, buttons, watchcases; jewelry; precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments; watches and clocks; watch straps; chains and bands for watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Animal skins; trunks and travelling bags; luggage; bags, namely, garment bags for travel, leather bags in the nature of pouches for merchandise packaging; carry-on bags, day packs, duffel bags, clutch bags, back packs, rucksacs, kit bags, overnight bags; document cases; attache cases; briefcases; suitcases; valises; handbags; shoulder bags; satchels; gym bags; tote bags; shopping bags; holdalls for travel; bags and holdalls for sports clothing; shoe bags for travel; beach bags; bags for strapping to the body, namely fanny packs, waist packs; hip bags; pouches; purses, wallets, billfolds; business card cases; credit card cases; key cases, luggage tags, all of leather or imitation leather; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jackets, coats, overcoats, pants, slacks, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, leggings, belts, ties, dresses, skirts, tights, jeans, jerseys, pullovers, sweaters, scarves, trousers, vests, cardigans, shawls, underwear, lingerie, stockings, blouses, nightwear, sarongs, shoulder wraps, tops; footwear; headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Akkurate Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Akkurate Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RICH JOHN RICHMOND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |