USPTO serial 78541969
GLOBUS ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GLOBUS ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Ross
Robert J. Ross OLSON & CEPURITIS, LTD.36TH FLOOR20 NORTH WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software Development Tools Used to Create Infrastructure For Distributed Computing Systems, In the Nature of a Collection of Basic Software And Associated Software Interfaces and Protocols, In Areas Such as Communications, Information, Resource Location and Scheduling, Security, And Data Access, Which Together May Be Used By Programmers to Create Applications Which Couple Geographically-Distributed, Heterogeneous Collections of Resources | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2003 |
| 041 | Training Sessions, Conferences, Workshops, Forums and Other Media Organized or Conducted to Provide Participants with Information Education or Opportunities to Discuss Operation, Maintenance and Development of Software Development Tools For Computing Systems Integrating Geographically-Distributed Computational and Information Resources | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2003 |
| 042 | Research in the field of operation, maintenance and development of software development tools for computing systems integrating geographically-distributed computational and information resources | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UCHICAGO ARGONNE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by UCHICAGO ARGONNE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by University of Chicago, The
- Other trademarks owned by University of Chicago, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GLOBUS ALLIANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |