USPTO serial 78542045
YAKATU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEWIS, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YAKATU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF DATA VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS AND WIRELESS MEDIA, NAMELY BROADCASTING IMAGES, SOUND AND DATA VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE AND WEB CONFERENCING SERVICES VIA TELEPHONY AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | ABANDONED | May 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |