Drawing for MOST PREFERRED.  MOST REFERRED.

USPTO serial 78542353

MOST PREFERRED. MOST REFERRED.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOST PREFERRED. MOST REFERRED.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Lisi

MICHAEL A LISI HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ & COHN LLP38500 WOODWARD AVE STE 100BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-0908UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, repair and replacement of windows, doorwalls, window sills, window glass, air conditioner inserts and related goods; providing information via the Internet in the fields of installation and repair of windows, doorwalls, window sills, window glass, air conditioner inserts and related goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 10, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 30, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance