USPTO serial 78542373
PIEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SIGNAL HILL, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER GOODS; NAMELY, LUGGAGE, SUITCASES, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, TOTE BAGS, BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS, ATTACHE CASES, BRIEFCASES, GARMENT COVERS, CARRY-ON BAGS, DUFFEL BAGS, LEATHER SHOPPING BAGS, BUSINESSMAN CASES, TRAIN BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, ALL PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS, FANNY PACKS, BACKPACKS, DOCUMENT POUCHES, WALLETS, LEATHER TRAVEL KITS SOLD EMPTY, HAND BAGS, POCKETBOOKS, LEATHER TOILETRY CASES SOLD EMPTY, PASSPORT HOLDERS, COIN PURSES, KEY CASES, LEATHER COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, AND BUSINESS CARD CASES | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1977 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |