CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SIGHT SAVER

USPTO serial 78542535

SIGHT SAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIGHT SAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald P. Nehra

GERALD P NEHRA NEHRA LAW FIRM1710 BEACH STMUSKEGON, MI 49441UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dietary supplements, namely non-prescription nutrition supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 5, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance